lang_in_20/lib/lisp.coffee

fs = require 'fs'
{parse} = require './lisp_parser'
lisp = require './parser'
{scope} = require './scope'
{inspect} = require 'util'

module.exports =
  run: (pathname) ->
    text = fs.readFileSync(pathname, 'utf8')
    ast = parse(text)
    return lisp(ast, scope)
A working version of Scheme in 20 Minutes. 2015-03-16 03:11:14 +00:00			`fs = require 'fs'`
			`{parse} = require './lisp_parser'`
			`lisp = require './parser'`
Updated to make the internals more 'lispy.' I've introduced a lisp-like singly-linked list handler, and removed all of the object-oriented materials. There are still records, but those are different from scoped objects in the given context. This has really helped me understand what's going on with the difference between the dynamic and lexical scopes, which has been one of my biggest headaches. 2015-03-16 17:17:51 +00:00			`{scope} = require './scope'`
A working version of Scheme in 20 Minutes. 2015-03-16 03:11:14 +00:00			`{inspect} = require 'util'`

			`module.exports =`
			`run: (pathname) ->`
			`text = fs.readFileSync(pathname, 'utf8')`
			`ast = parse(text)`
Updated to make the internals more 'lispy.' I've introduced a lisp-like singly-linked list handler, and removed all of the object-oriented materials. There are still records, but those are different from scoped objects in the given context. This has really helped me understand what's going on with the difference between the dynamic and lexical scopes, which has been one of my biggest headaches. 2015-03-16 17:17:51 +00:00			`return lisp(ast, scope)`
A working version of Scheme in 20 Minutes. 2015-03-16 03:11:14 +00:00