Fixed a typo in the Journal
This commit is contained in:
parent
abdc9f184f
commit
a97a52c9a5
|
@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ doesn't help you understand how to use the library. `XCBWrapper` is
|
|||
an excellent example of how to use XCB, but it uses some fairly
|
||||
high-level C++ to accomplish all that it does, and untangling the
|
||||
relationship between the wrapper template, the macro that does wrapper
|
||||
declarations, and the XCB Reference; once you find the insight that
|
||||
XCB's declarations are all derived from a massive XML file, you can
|
||||
start to understand that XCBWrapper exploits the patterns produced by
|
||||
the derivative file, but it requires insight and effort that's
|
||||
unrelated to understanding XCB in the first place.
|
||||
declarations, and the XCB Reference, was quite a challenge; once you
|
||||
find the insight that XCB's declarations are all derived from a
|
||||
massive XML file, you can start to understand that XCBWrapper exploits
|
||||
the patterns produced by the derivative file, but it requires insight
|
||||
and effort that's unrelated to understanding XCB in the first place.
|
||||
|
||||
This project does show the usual trajectory of one of my learning
|
||||
exercises, especially since I'm fond of delving in places where no man
|
||||
|
@ -37,3 +37,8 @@ now it's all starting to make sense. I also note that I'm doing
|
|||
_better_ than a lot of the open-source examples, in that I'm batching
|
||||
many of my requests before processing them. I'm not batching storing
|
||||
the replies yet, but I don't see why that couldn't happen.
|
||||
|
||||
I did attempt at one point to start using `std::unique_ptr` to
|
||||
automatically free `_reply_t` objects that XCB allocated for me, but
|
||||
after playing with them for an hour or so my initial impression is
|
||||
that I'm utterly thrilled with Rust's ergonomics. Just sayin'.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue